A Spy’s Guide to Spy Movies: Bridge of Spies

Bridge of Spies (2015) doesn’t have a spy for the main character. He’s a lawyer.

James Donovan - played by Tom Hanks - is an insurance attorney in Brooklyn. He’s asked to defend Rudolf Abel, a Soviet spy caught on American soil. Nobody wants Abel defended. The government wants a conviction. The public wants a conviction. Donovan’s own family wants him to walk away.

Donovan defends him anyway. And does it well.

But the part that matters for strategy comes later. After Abel is convicted, an American U-2 pilot named Francis Gary Powers is shot down over the Soviet Union. Now the U.S. wants him back. The Soviets want Abel back. Donovan is sent to East Berlin to negotiate the exchange.

He’s not a spy. He’s not a diplomat. He’s a lawyer who thinks clearly under pressure.

And he negotiates by understanding Endgames.

- - -

The first thing Donovan does is figure out the real Endgame for each side. The Americans say they want Powers back. True. But the CIA also doesn’t want to look weak.

The Soviets say they want Abel back. Also true. But the East Germans - who are holding an American graduate student named Frederic Pryor - want to be treated as a legitimate government.

Everyone at the table has a stated goal and an unstated goal. The negotiation only works when Donovan sees all of them.

That’s Endgame Reasoning. Look forward to what each side actually needs at the end, then reason backward to the games that must be played to get there.

(This movie plus eleven more are in A Spy’s Guide to Spy Movies. It’s on Amazon here.)

- - -

Donovan also sees something the CIA doesn’t: this isn’t a Zero-Sum Game. The obvious framing is Zero-Sum - one side gives up a prisoner, the other side gives up a prisoner. Even trade.

But Donovan realizes there’s a Positive-Sum move available. He can get Powers back and get Pryor back. Both sides can walk away with more than they expected. The CIA tells him to forget about Pryor. Donovan refuses. He sees the larger game.

- - -

The other thing Bridge of Spies gets right is something small. Early in the film, Donovan asks Abel if he’s worried. Abel’s answer: “Would it help?”

That’s honest analysis. No wishful thinking, no panic, no bravado. Just a clear-eyed look at the situation and a refusal to let emotion replace thinking. It’s three words, but it’s the entire foundation of good strategy. Would it help? If not, don’t do it. Move on to what would.

- - -

Donovan isn’t a spy. He never fires a weapon. He never runs a countersurveillance route.

But he reasons backward from the Endgame. He identifies the real game being played. He sees what each side actually wants. And he finds the Positive-Sum outcome that nobody else saw.

You don’t have to be a spy to think like one. You just need the frameworks.

- - -

Endgame Reasoning is one of six frameworks on the Spy’s Guide frameworks page, and it’s from A Spy’s Guide to Strategy.

-John Braddock

As an Amazon Associate spysguide.com earns from qualifying purchases.